United States v. Little

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7302

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL AARON LITTLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-99-132; CA-01-702)

Submitted: December 23, 2004 Decided: January 19, 2005

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Aaron Little, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Victoria Watford- McKinney, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael Aaron Little appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of

discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Little, Nos. CR-99-132; CA-

01-702 (E.D.N.C. July 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -