United States v. Little

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Little

37 F. App'x 697

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2002·No. No. 01-6917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Terry Little seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See San Miguel v. Dove, 291 F.3d 257 (4th [698]*698Cir.2002). Although we grant leave to file a supplemental brief, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Terry Little seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See San Miguel v. Dove, 291 F.3d 257 (4th [698]*698Cir.2002). Although we grant leave to file a supplemental brief, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Little, 37 F. App'x 697 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

37 F. App'x 697 (United States v. Little) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related