United States v. Little

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Little

3 F. App'x 122

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 14, 2001

Docket00-7454

StatusUnpublished

This text of 3 F. App'x 122 (United States v. Little) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Little, 3 F. App'x 122 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Warren Lamont Little appeals from the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Little, No. CR-95-146 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Warren Lamont Little appeals from the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Little, No. CR-95-146 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 F. App'x 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-little-ca4-2001.