United States v. Little

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Little

68 F. App'x 518

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Little. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 F. App'x 200 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 17, 2003·No. 03-6747·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Trevor Little appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his motions for correction or reduction of sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35. We have *519 reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Little, No. CR-95-198 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Trevor Little appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his motions for correction or reduction of sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35. We have *519 reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Little, No. CR-95-198 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Little, 68 F. App'x 518 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

68 F. App'x 518 (United States v. Little) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.