United States v. Knight

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6311

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROY KNIGHT, a/k/a Little Roy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:03-cr-00163-JRS-1)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: June 1, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Knight, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Steven Dry, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Roy Knight appeals the district court’s order denying

his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of

sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Knight, No.

3:03-cr-00163-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 29, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED