United States v. Knight

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Knight. Read the opinion of the Court — 606 F.3d 171
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 16, 2007·No. 07-6401·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6401

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ELBERT THOMAS KNIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 07-6402

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:96-cr-00196-HCM; 2:00-cr-00056-RAJ)

Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 16, 2007 Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elbert Thomas Knight, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Elbert Thomas Knight

appeals the district court’s order denying reconsideration of his

motion seeking an order to compel the Government to file a motion

to reduce his sentence based on substantial assistance. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United

States v. Knight, Nos. 2:96-cr-00196-HCM; 2:00-cr-00056-RAJ (E.D.

Va. filed Feb. 27, 2007; entered Feb. 28, 2007). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Knight, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Knight (United States v. Knight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.