United States v. Knight

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Knight

251 F. App'x 164

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Knight. Read the opinion of the Court — 606 F.3d 171 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 16, 2007·No. Nos. 07-6401, 07-6402·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Elbert Thomas Knight appeals the district court’s order denying reconsideration of his motion seeking an order to compel the Government to file a motion to reduce his sentence based on substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Knight, Nos. 2:96-cr-00196-HCM; 2:00-cr-00056-RAJ (E.D.Va. filed Feb. 27, 2007; entered Feb. 28, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Elbert Thomas Knight appeals the district court’s order denying reconsideration of his motion seeking an order to compel the Government to file a motion to reduce his sentence based on substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Knight, Nos. 2:96-cr-00196-HCM; 2:00-cr-00056-RAJ (E.D.Va. filed Feb. 27, 2007; entered Feb. 28, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Knight, 251 F. App'x 164 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

251 F. App'x 164 (United States v. Knight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.