United States v. King

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 123 F. App'x 144
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 13, 2002·No. 01-11078·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-11078 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY KING, SR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-57-2-A -------------------- September 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Anthony King, Sr., has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). King has received a copy of

counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a response. Our

review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. -2-

R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. King, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. King (United States v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)