United States v. King
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-50924 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DERNEL DUPREE KING,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-98-CR-90-1 - - - - - - - - - - July 26, 2001 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Dernel Dupree King appeals his conditional guilty-plea
conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute
cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. He argues that the
district court erred in denying his motion to suppress.
We hold that the district court did not err in denying the
motion to suppress. Although King limited the manner in which the
search could be conducted, he did not completely withdraw his
consent to the search, and the investigating officer did not exceed
the limits imposed on the search. See Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-50924 -2-
248 (1991); United States v. McSween, 53 F.3d 684 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. King (United States v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.