United States v. King

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2001·No. 00-31483·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-31483 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NELSON L. KING, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (00-CR-10007-2) -------------------- June 18, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Nelson L. King, Jr., on

appeal has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

King has not filed a response to counsel's motion and brief.

Our independent review of the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R.

42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. King, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. King (United States v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)