United States v. King

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 20, 2002
Docket01-50783
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. King (United States v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. King, (5th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50783 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LADON KENTRELL KING,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-00-CR-111-2 -------------------- June 18, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ladon Kentrell King (“King”) appeals the sentencing

following his jury conviction for possession with the intent to

distribute crack cocaine. King argues that the district court

erred in assessing a three level sentence enhancement pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 3A1.2(b).

This court reviews legal conclusions by the district court

de novo, and the district court’s findings of fact are reviewed

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-50783 -2-

for clear error. See United States v. Ocana, 204 F.3d 585, 588

(5th Cir. 2000). The sentence adjustment was not clearly

erroneous because King’s actions of giving the gun to his

co-defendant and instructing him to exit the vehicle with the gun

caused a substantial risk of serious bodily injury when King’s

co-defendant subsequently pointed the firearm at the officers.

See U.S.S.G. § 3A1.2(b); see also United States v. Ortiz-

Granados, 12 F.3d 39, 41-43 (5th Cir. 1994).

For the foregoing reasons, King’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ortiz-Granados
12 F.3d 39 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Flora Alicia Ocana
204 F.3d 585 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. King, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-king-ca5-2002.