United States v. King
This text of United States v. King (United States v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-50783 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LADON KENTRELL KING,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-00-CR-111-2 -------------------- June 18, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ladon Kentrell King (“King”) appeals the sentencing
following his jury conviction for possession with the intent to
distribute crack cocaine. King argues that the district court
erred in assessing a three level sentence enhancement pursuant to
U.S.S.G. § 3A1.2(b).
This court reviews legal conclusions by the district court
de novo, and the district court’s findings of fact are reviewed
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-50783 -2-
for clear error. See United States v. Ocana, 204 F.3d 585, 588
(5th Cir. 2000). The sentence adjustment was not clearly
erroneous because King’s actions of giving the gun to his
co-defendant and instructing him to exit the vehicle with the gun
caused a substantial risk of serious bodily injury when King’s
co-defendant subsequently pointed the firearm at the officers.
See U.S.S.G. § 3A1.2(b); see also United States v. Ortiz-
Granados, 12 F.3d 39, 41-43 (5th Cir. 1994).
For the foregoing reasons, King’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. King, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-king-ca5-2002.