United States v. Jupiter

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6280

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CLARENCE SHELDON JUPITER, a/k/a Star,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:93-cr-00004-sgw-1)

Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 26, 2010

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Sheldon Jupiter, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clarence Sheldon Jupiter appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for

reduction of sentence based on Amendments 505 and 706 to the

U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jupiter,

No. 5:93-cr-00004-sgw-1 (W.D. Va. Aug. 21, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED