United States v. Jupiter
This text of 475 F. App'x 881 (United States v. Jupiter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Clarence Sheldon Jupiter appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir.2010) (providing standard). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
475 F. App'x 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jupiter-ca4-2012.