United States v. Jupiter

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Jupiter

399 F. App'x 802

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 26, 2010·No. No. 10-6280·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Sheldon Jupiter appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence based on Amendments 505 and 706 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jupiter, No. 5:93-cr-00004-sgw-1 (W.D.Va. Aug. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Sheldon Jupiter appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence based on Amendments 505 and 706 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jupiter, No. 5:93-cr-00004-sgw-1 (W.D.Va. Aug. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Jupiter, 399 F. App'x 802 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

399 F. App'x 802 (United States v. Jupiter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related