United States v. Johnson

667 F. App'x 58
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 28, 2016·No. No. 16-6144·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wendell Antonio Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion filed without authorization. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Johnson’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Johnson has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnson, 667 F. App'x 58 (4th Cir. 2016).

667 F. App'x 58 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related