United States v. Johnson

631 F. App'x 141
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2016·No. No. 15-7384·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Barry Alan Johnson appeals from the district court’s orders granting his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 4:11-cr-02156-TLW-1 (D.S.C. July 31, 2015; Aug. 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnson, 631 F. App'x 141 (4th Cir. 2016).

631 F. App'x 141 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related