United States v. Johnson
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Raheem Abdus Salam Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction under Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Johnson, No. 4:08-cr-00876-RBH-2 (D.S.C. July 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument [110]*110because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
623 F. App'x 109 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.