United States v. Johnson

623 F. App'x 109
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 529 F. App'x 362
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 24, 2015·No. No. 15-7243·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raheem Abdus Salam Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction under Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Johnson, No. 4:08-cr-00876-RBH-2 (D.S.C. July 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument [110]*110because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnson, 623 F. App'x 109 (4th Cir. 2015).

623 F. App'x 109 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related