United States v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Johnson

598 F. App'x 184

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2015·No. No. 14-6156·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antwaine Tacoma Johnson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. United States, Nos. 4:08-cr-00024-FL-1; 4:12-cv-00080-FL, 2014 WL 223450 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 2014). We deny Johnson’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antwaine Tacoma Johnson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. United States, Nos. 4:08-cr-00024-FL-1; 4:12-cv-00080-FL, 2014 WL 223450 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 2014). We deny Johnson’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Johnson, 598 F. App'x 184 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

598 F. App'x 184 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related