United States v. Jackson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 109 F. App'x 550
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 20, 2007·No. 07-6134·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6134

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

THOMAS LEE JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:92-cr-00214-CMH)

Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 20, 2007

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Lee Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edward Rich, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas Lee Jackson appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2000) and subsequent motion for reconsideration. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Jackson, No. 1:92-cr-00214-CMH (E.D.

Va. filed Dec. 12, 2006 & entered Dec. 13, 2006; filed Jan. 3, 2007

& entered Jan. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jackson, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related