United States v. Jackson
Opinion
Leon Jackson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reconsideration and to vacate sentence, and for documents at Government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Jackson, No. CR-95-6-A (E.D. Va. June 24, 2004 & July 7, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
114 F. App'x 575 (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.