United States v. Jackson

114 F. App'x 575
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 F. App'x 291
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 29, 2004·No. 04-7158·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leon Jackson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reconsideration and to vacate sentence, and for documents at Government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Jackson, No. CR-95-6-A (E.D. Va. June 24, 2004 & July 7, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jackson, 114 F. App'x 575 (4th Cir. 2004).

114 F. App'x 575 (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.