United States v. Jackson
This text of 24 F. App'x 233 (United States v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ronald Floyd Jackson appeals from the district court’s order declining to recuse itself from consideration of Jackson’s otherwise closed 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) motion, and denying Jackson’s successive motion for relief. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. CR-90-254; CA-98-2129-4-12 (D.S.C. July 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 F. App'x 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jackson-ca4-2002.