United States v. Jackson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6153
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KELLIS DION JACKSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 02-6154
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-87-38-A, CA-01-1563-AM, CR-87-85-A, CA-02-139- AM)
Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 23, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kellis Dion Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Paul J. McNulty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Kellis Dion Jackson seeks to
appeal from the district court’s order construing his motion for a
writ of habeas corpus as one filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 2001), and denying it. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on
the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jackson,
Nos. CR-87-38-A; CR-87-85-A; CA-01-1563-AM; CA-02-139-AM (E.D. Va.
Dec. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.