United States v. Jackson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 23, 2002·No. 02-6153·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6153

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KELLIS DION JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 02-6154

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-87-38-A, CA-01-1563-AM, CR-87-85-A, CA-02-139- AM)

Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 23, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kellis Dion Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Paul J. McNulty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Kellis Dion Jackson seeks to

appeal from the district court’s order construing his motion for a

writ of habeas corpus as one filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

Supp. 2001), and denying it. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on

the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jackson,

Nos. CR-87-38-A; CR-87-85-A; CA-01-1563-AM; CA-02-139-AM (E.D. Va.

Dec. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jackson, (4th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Jackson (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related