United States v. Jackson

109 F. App'x 556
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 F. App'x 291
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 16, 2004·No. No. 04-7138·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eddie Thomas Jackson appeals a district court order denying motions claiming the indictment was defective and seeking to have his conviction vacated. On direct appeal, this Court found Jackson’s guilty plea was knowing and voluntary. See United States v. Jackson, 48 Fed.Appx. 902 (4th Cir.2002) (unpublished). We find the district court properly denied Jackson’s motions. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Jackson, No. CR-00-607 (D.S.C. June 22, 2004). We deny Jackson’s motion to prohibit certain justices from hearing his appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jackson, 109 F. App'x 556 (4th Cir. 2004).

109 F. App'x 556 (United States v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jackson
48 F. App'x 902 (Fourth Circuit, 2002)