United States v. Hunter

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hunter. Read the opinion of the Court — 371 F. App'x 436
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 22, 2010·No. 09-6798A·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6798

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DWIGHT LAMONT HUNTER, a/k/a Dee,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:94-cr-00111-GCM-12)

Submitted: June 15, 2010 Decided: June 22, 2010

Before MICHAEL, * MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwight Lamont Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

* Judge Michael was a member of the original panel but did not participate in this decision. This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). PER CURIAM:

Dwight Lamont Hunter appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Hunter, No.

3:94-cr-00111-GCM-12 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 8, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hunter, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Hunter (United States v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related