United States v. Hunter

351 F. App'x 833
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hunter. Read the opinion of the Court — 371 F. App'x 436
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 17, 2009·No. 09-6798·Unpublished

Opinion

Remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dwight Lamont Hunter seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice *834 of appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).

The district court entered judgment on April 8, 2009. Hunter filed the notice of appeal on April 28, 2009, after the ten-day period expired but within the thirty-day excusable neglect period. Because the notice of appeal was filed within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case to the district court for the court to determine whether Hunter has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the ten-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hunter, 351 F. App'x 833 (4th Cir. 2009).

351 F. App'x 833 (United States v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jose v. Reyes
759 F.2d 351 (Fourth Circuit, 1985)