United States v. Hunter

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hunter. Read the opinion of the Court — 371 F. App'x 436
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2009·No. 08-7647·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7647

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EDWARD CHARLES HUNTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:04-cr-00122-WDK-JEB-1)

Submitted: March 23, 2009 Decided: April 3, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Charles Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Edward Charles Hunter appeals the district court’s

order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), but refusing to grant a further

reduction and refusing to appoint counsel. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Hunter, No. 4:04-cr-00122-WDK-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 8, 2008

& entered July 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Hunter, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Hunter (United States v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related