United States v. Hairston

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7310

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00024-JPB-JES-1)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 20, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., appeals the district court’s

order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate

judge and denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion to modify

his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Hairston, No.

3:00-cr-00024-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 3, 2010). We deny

Hairston’s “Motion for the Court to Issue an Order.” We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED