United States v. Hairston

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6683

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00024-JPB-1)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying his petition for a writ of audita querela. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Hairston, No. 3:00-cr-00024-JPB-1 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 30,

2009). We deny Hairston’s motions for appointment of counsel

and a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED