United States v. Hairston
This text of 271 F. App'x 368 (United States v. Hairston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael Wendell Hairston appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for transcripts at government expense and subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Hairston, No. 4:06-cr-00018-jlk (W.D.Va. June 21, 2007 & July 16, 2007). We deny Hairston’s motion for transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 F. App'x 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hairston-ca4-2008.