United States v. Gore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

EDWARD GORE,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (0:04-cr-00657-JFA-4)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Gore, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, Christopher Todd Hagins, SOUTH CAROLINA LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Edward Gore appeals the district court’s order

granting the Government’s Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35

motion and granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion and

its subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Gore, No. 0:04-cr-00657-JFA-4 (D.S.C. Dec. 16, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED