United States v. Gore
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7381
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOHNNY LEE GORE,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 07-7445
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:01-cr-00627-CWH-9)
Submitted: October 1, 2008 Decided: November 3, 2008
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnny Lee Gore, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated cases, Johnny Lee Gore appeals the
district court’s orders denying Gore’s motions to dismiss the
indictment (No. 07-7381) and to disclose exculpatory evidence and
present new evidence (No. 07-7445). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Gore,
No. 4:01-cr-00627-CWH-9 (D.S.C. Sept. 17 and 20, 2007). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Gore (United States v. Gore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.