United States v. Gore

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gore. Read the opinion of the Court — 592 F.3d 489
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 3, 2008·No. 07-7381·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7381

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHNNY LEE GORE,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 07-7445

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:01-cr-00627-CWH-9)

Submitted: October 1, 2008 Decided: November 3, 2008

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Lee Gore, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Johnny Lee Gore appeals the

district court’s orders denying Gore’s motions to dismiss the

indictment (No. 07-7381) and to disclose exculpatory evidence and

present new evidence (No. 07-7445). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Gore,

No. 4:01-cr-00627-CWH-9 (D.S.C. Sept. 17 and 20, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gore, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Gore (United States v. Gore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.