United States v. Gore

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gore. Read the opinion of the Court — 592 F.3d 489
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 16, 2010·No. 097346·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7346

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICHARD MONDELL GORE, a/k/a Richard Mondell Spann, a/k/a Bomb Threat,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (0:05-cr-01000-JFA-1)

Submitted: March 5, 2010 Decided: March 16, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Mondell Gore, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley Duane Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard Mondell Gore appeals the district court’s

orders reducing his sentence pursuant to the Government’s Fed.

R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion and granting in part and denying in

part reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s orders and deny as moot Gore’s motion to

expedite the decision. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gore, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Gore (United States v. Gore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.