United States v. Garner

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Garner. Read the opinion of the Court — 283 F. App'x 176
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 29, 2009·No. 09-6455·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6455

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHARLES EDWARD GARNER, a/k/a Chew,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:02-cr-00133-LMB-1)

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 29, 2009

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Edward Garner, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Joseph Rossi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Edward Garner appeals the district court’s

orders granting, in part, his motion for reduction of sentence,

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), but denying his motion for

reconsideration in which he sought a further reduction. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Garner, No. 1:02-cr-00133-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 27,

2008; Feb. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Garner, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Garner (United States v. Garner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related