United States v. Garner

282 F. App'x 235
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Garner. Read the opinion of the Court — 283 F. App'x 176
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2008·No. 07-7539·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Drew Garner appeals the district court’s order committing him to the custody of the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 (2000). The district court found by clear and convincing evidence that Garner “is presently suffering from a mental disease or defect as a result of which his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to property of another.” 18 U.S.C. § 4246(d) (2000).

We review the district court’s determination for clear error. United States v. Cox, 964 F.2d 1431, 1433 (4th Cir.1992). A factual finding is clearly erroneous when the reviewing court is “left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573, 105 S.Ct. 1504, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

We have reviewed the record, the district court’s conclusion, and the briefs of the parties, and find that the district court’s determination is supported by the record and is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Garner, 282 F. App'x 235 (4th Cir. 2008).

282 F. App'x 235 (United States v. Garner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related