United States v. Garner
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Charles Edward Garner appeals the district court’s orders granting, in part, his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), but denying his motion for reconsideration in which he sought a further reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Garner, No. 1:02-er-00133-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2008; Feb. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
329 F. App'x 468 (United States v. Garner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.