United States v. Fell

571 F.3d 264, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13029, 2009 WL 1684509
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJune 17, 2009
Docket06-2882-cr
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 571 F.3d 264 (United States v. Fell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Fell, 571 F.3d 264, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13029, 2009 WL 1684509 (2d Cir. 2009).

Opinions

ORDER

Defendant-Appellant Donald Fell, having filed a petition for panel rehearing or, in the alternative, for rehearing en banc, and the panel that determined the appeal having considered the request for panel rehearing, and the active members1 of the Court having considered the request for rehearing en banc, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is DENIED. See Fed. R.App. P. 35(a).

Pursuant to Second Circuit Local Rule 0.28(7)(d), an automatic stay of execution of the sentence of death has been in place as of the date of the filing of the notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction, and remains in effect (unless vacated or modified) until the expiration of all proceedings available to the Defendant-Appellant (including review by the United States Supreme Court) as part of the direct review of the judgment of conviction.

Accordingly, the issuance of the mandate is held until the expiration of all proceedings available to the Defendant-Appellant (including review by the United States Supreme Court) as part of the direct review of the judgment of conviction.

With this Order, Judge RAGGI is filing a concurring opinion, in which Chief Judge JACOBS and Judges CABRANES, B.D. PARKER, WESLEY, and LIVINGSTON join; Judge CALABRESI is filing a dissenting opinion; Judge POOLER is filing a dissenting opinion; and Judge SACK is filing a dissenting opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Dennis
132 F.4th 214 (Second Circuit, 2025)
State v. Jason Roberts
2024 VT 32 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2024)
United States v. Mills
388 F. Supp. 3d 895 (E.D. Michigan, 2019)
United States v. Aquart
912 F.3d 1 (Second Circuit, 2018)
United States v. Fell
944 F. Supp. 2d 297 (D. Vermont, 2013)
United States v. Johnson
900 F. Supp. 2d 949 (N.D. Iowa, 2012)
United States v. Broxmeyer
699 F.3d 265 (Second Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Gabrion
648 F.3d 307 (Sixth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Fell
571 F.3d 264 (Second Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
571 F.3d 264, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13029, 2009 WL 1684509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fell-ca2-2009.