United States v. Exarhos
135 F.3d 723
This text of 135 F.3d 723 (United States v. Exarhos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Exarhos, 135 F.3d 723 (11th Cir. 1998).
Opinion
Edmondson, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part:
I concur in the result and in the opinion of the Court,
except I dissent from the Court’s conclusion on sentencing
discussed at III.A. of the Court’s opinion: Given the nature of
the evidence before the district court at sentencing, I cannot
say that the district court committed clear error. I would affirm
the convictions and sentences.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Enrique Balderas
163 F. App'x 769 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. James W. Long
300 F. App'x 804 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Blanc
146 F.3d 847 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Blanc
146 F.3d 847 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Sigma International, Inc.
196 F.3d 1314 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Sigma International, Inc.
196 F.3d 1314 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Shedrick McDowell
Eleventh Circuit, 2001
United States v. Shedrick McDowell
Eleventh Circuit, 2001
United States v. Dewey M. Hamaker
455 F.3d 1316 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Shedrick McDowell Bardomiano Piedra-Bustos, A.K.A. Bardomiano Bustos-Piedra
250 F.3d 1354 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 F.3d 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-exarhos-ca11-1998.