FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 232
Procedure for issuance and enforcement of order of restitution
18 U.S.C. § 3664
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter232 — MISCELLANEOUS SENTENCING PROVISIONS
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 3664 (Procedure for issuance and enforcement of order of restitution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 3664.
Text
(a)For orders of restitution under this title, the court shall order the probation officer to obtain and include in its presentence report, or in a separate report, as the court may direct, information sufficient for the court to exercise its discretion in fashioning a restitution order. The report shall include, to the extent practicable, a complete accounting of the losses to each victim, any restitution owed pursuant to a plea agreement, and information relating to the economic circumstances of each defendant. If the number or identity of victims cannot be reasonably ascertained, or other circumstances exist that make this requirement clearly impracticable, the probation officer shall so inform the court.
(b)The court shall disclose to both the defendant and the attorney for the Gover
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. David Prouty
303 F.3d 1249 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)
United States v. David H. Swanson
394 F.3d 520 (Seventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Lilly
80 F.3d 24 (First Circuit, 1996)
Wilson v. Commissioner
705 F.3d 980 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. ROBERT ALLEN CARRUTH, DEFENDANT—APPELLANT
418 F.3d 900 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Bradford Lee Butler
297 F.3d 505 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Vance Inouye
821 F.3d 1152 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Starr Tyme, Inc. v. Cohen
638 So. 2d 599 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
United States v. Harwood
854 F. Supp. 2d 1035 (D. New Mexico, 2012)
United States v. Lundquist
847 F. Supp. 2d 364 (N.D. New York, 2011)
United States v. Randy Wilkins
649 F. App'x 434 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Backari Mackey
649 F. App'x 674 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)
Cargill v. Jacquez
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
United States v. Ewen P. Barnett
77 F.3d 486 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Larry James Rich
81 F.3d 171 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Bradley William Groceman, United States of America v. Jeffrey Dean Groceman
81 F.3d 171 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Cherifo Bodian, Also Known as Sherif B.
99 F.3d 400 (Second Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Darrell Dean Van Brocklin, United States of America v. Travis Edward Atterberry, United States of America v. Lawrence Kermit Pyatt, United States of America v. Susan Kay Hastings
115 F.3d 587 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Eugene H. Mathison, United States of America v. Perry Gobel, United States of America v. Robert E. Holmes, United States of America v. Dean G. Chambers
157 F.3d 541 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
Richards v. Vuksic
(S.D. West Virginia, 2018)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 97–291, §5(a), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1255, §3580; renumbered §3664, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §212(a)(1), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1987; amended Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, §3596, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4931; Pub. L. 104–132, title II, §206(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1232; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4002(e)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1810.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, referred to in subsecs. (c) and (o)(1)(A), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
Amendments
2002—Subsec. (o)(1)(C). Pub. L. 107–273 substituted "subsection (d)(5)" for "section 3664(d)(3)".
1996—Pub. L. 104–132 amended section generally, substituting provisions relating to procedure for issuance and enforcement of orders of restitution for provisions relating to procedure for issuing orders of restitution.
1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–647 substituted "3663" for "3579".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–132 to be effective, to extent constitutionally permissible, for sentencing proceedings in cases in which defendant is convicted on or after Apr. 24, 1996, see section 211 of Pub. L. 104–132, set out as a note under section 2248 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective with respect to offenses occurring after Jan. 1, 1983, see section 9(b)(2) of Pub. L. 97–291, set out as a note under section 1512 of this title.
References in Text
The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, referred to in subsecs. (c) and (o)(1)(A), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
Amendments
2002—Subsec. (o)(1)(C). Pub. L. 107–273 substituted "subsection (d)(5)" for "section 3664(d)(3)".
1996—Pub. L. 104–132 amended section generally, substituting provisions relating to procedure for issuance and enforcement of orders of restitution for provisions relating to procedure for issuing orders of restitution.
1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–647 substituted "3663" for "3579".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 104–132 to be effective, to extent constitutionally permissible, for sentencing proceedings in cases in which defendant is convicted on or after Apr. 24, 1996, see section 211 of Pub. L. 104–132, set out as a note under section 2248 of this title.
Effective Date
Section effective with respect to offenses occurring after Jan. 1, 1983, see section 9(b)(2) of Pub. L. 97–291, set out as a note under section 1512 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 3664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/3664.