FEDERAL · 18 U.S.C. · Chapter 109A
Mandatory restitution
18 U.S.C. § 2248
Title18 — Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter109A — SEXUAL ABUSE
This text of 18 U.S.C. § 2248 (Mandatory restitution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
18 U.S.C. § 2248.
Text
(a)In General.—Notwithstanding section 3663 or 3663A, and in addition to any other civil or criminal penalty authorized by law, the court shall order restitution for any offense under this chapter.
(b)Scope and Nature of Order.—
(1)Directions.—The order of restitution under this section shall direct the defendant to pay to the victim (through the appropriate court mechanism) the full amount of the victim's losses as determined by the court pursuant to paragraph (2).
(3)Definition.—For purposes of this subsection, the term "full amount of the victim's losses" includes any costs incurred by the victim for—
(A)medical
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Willie A. Newman
144 F.3d 531 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Gary D. Bollin, United States of America v. Ernst N. Tietjen, United States of America v. James Gormley
264 F.3d 391 (Fourth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Evers
669 F.3d 645 (Sixth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Mary M. Porter
41 F.3d 68 (Second Circuit, 1994)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack Curtis COMER, Defendant-Appellant
93 F.3d 1271 (Sixth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. George Thompson
113 F.3d 13 (Second Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Baggett
125 F.3d 1319 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Labeille-Soto
163 F.3d 93 (Second Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Joseph C. Minneman and Clarence G. Punke
143 F.3d 274 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Thomas Edward Karam
201 F.3d 320 (Fourth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Papagno
639 F.3d 1093 (D.C. Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Julian
242 F.3d 1245 (Tenth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Tsosie
639 F.3d 1213 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Harvey L. Hoover
175 F.3d 564 (Seventh Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Supawan Veerapol
312 F.3d 1128 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Lucien
347 F.3d 45 (Second Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Olson
104 F.3d 1234 (Tenth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Holy Bull
613 F.3d 871 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Atlantic States Cast Iron Pipe Co.
612 F. Supp. 2d 453 (D. New Jersey, 2009)
United States v. Michael Norwood
49 F.4th 189 (Third Circuit, 2022)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40113(a)(1), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1904; amended Pub. L. 104–132, title II, §205(b), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1231.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(1), inserted "or 3663A" after "3663".
Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(2)(A), reenacted heading without change and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The order of restitution under this section shall direct that—
"(A) the defendant pay to the victim (through the appropriate court mechanism) the full amount of the victim's losses as determined by the court, pursuant to paragraph (3); and
"(B) the United States Attorney enforce the restitution order by all available and reasonable means."
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(2)(B), struck out "by victim" after "Enforcement" in heading and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "An order of restitution also may be enforced by a victim named in the order to receive the restitution in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action."
Subsec. (b)(4)(C), (D). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(2)(C), struck out subpars. (C) and (D), which related to court's consideration of economic circumstances of defendant in determining schedule of payment of restitution orders, and court's entry of nominal restitution awards where economic circumstances of defendant do not allow for payment of restitution, respectively.
Subsec. (b)(5) to (10). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(2)(D), struck out pars. (5) to (10), which related, respectively, to more than 1 offender, more than 1 victim, payment schedule, setoff, effect on other sources of compensation, and condition of probation or supervised release.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(3), (4), redesignated subsec. (f) as (c) and struck out former subsec. (c) relating to proof of claim.
Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(3), struck out subsecs. (d) and (e) which read as follows:
"(d) Modification of Order.—A victim or the offender may petition the court at any time to modify a restitution order as appropriate in view of a change in the economic circumstances of the offender.
"(e) Reference to Magistrate or Special Master.—The court may refer any issue arising in connection with a proposed order of restitution to a magistrate or special master for proposed findings of fact and recommendations as to disposition, subject to a de novo determination of the issue by the court."
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(4), redesignated subsec. (f) as (c).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Pub. L. 104–132, title II, §211, Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1241, provided that: "The amendments made by this subtitle [subtitle A (§§201–211) of title II of Pub. L. 104–132, see Short Title of 1996 Amendment note set out under section 3551 of this title] shall, to the extent constitutionally permissible, be effective for sentencing proceedings in cases in which the defendant is convicted on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 24, 1996]."
Amendments
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(1), inserted "or 3663A" after "3663".
Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(2)(A), reenacted heading without change and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The order of restitution under this section shall direct that—
"(A) the defendant pay to the victim (through the appropriate court mechanism) the full amount of the victim's losses as determined by the court, pursuant to paragraph (3); and
"(B) the United States Attorney enforce the restitution order by all available and reasonable means."
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(2)(B), struck out "by victim" after "Enforcement" in heading and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "An order of restitution also may be enforced by a victim named in the order to receive the restitution in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action."
Subsec. (b)(4)(C), (D). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(2)(C), struck out subpars. (C) and (D), which related to court's consideration of economic circumstances of defendant in determining schedule of payment of restitution orders, and court's entry of nominal restitution awards where economic circumstances of defendant do not allow for payment of restitution, respectively.
Subsec. (b)(5) to (10). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(2)(D), struck out pars. (5) to (10), which related, respectively, to more than 1 offender, more than 1 victim, payment schedule, setoff, effect on other sources of compensation, and condition of probation or supervised release.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(3), (4), redesignated subsec. (f) as (c) and struck out former subsec. (c) relating to proof of claim.
Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(3), struck out subsecs. (d) and (e) which read as follows:
"(d) Modification of Order.—A victim or the offender may petition the court at any time to modify a restitution order as appropriate in view of a change in the economic circumstances of the offender.
"(e) Reference to Magistrate or Special Master.—The court may refer any issue arising in connection with a proposed order of restitution to a magistrate or special master for proposed findings of fact and recommendations as to disposition, subject to a de novo determination of the issue by the court."
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 104–132, §205(b)(4), redesignated subsec. (f) as (c).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Pub. L. 104–132, title II, §211, Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1241, provided that: "The amendments made by this subtitle [subtitle A (§§201–211) of title II of Pub. L. 104–132, see Short Title of 1996 Amendment note set out under section 3551 of this title] shall, to the extent constitutionally permissible, be effective for sentencing proceedings in cases in which the defendant is convicted on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 24, 1996]."
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 U.S.C. § 2248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/18/2248.