United States v. Esperdy
This text of 299 F.2d 938 (United States v. Esperdy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
299 F.2d 938
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. WONG SHONG KWONG, Relator-Appellant,
v.
P. A. ESPERDY, as District Director of the Immigration
Service for the District of New York, or such
person, if any, who may have the said
Wong Shong Kwong in custody,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 318, Docket 27426.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued March 7, 1962.
Decided March 7, 1962.
Abraham Lebenkoff, New York City (Jules E. Coven, New York City on the brief), for relator-appellant.
Roy Babitt, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty. (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., on the brief), for respondent-appellee.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and KAUFMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm in open court the order of the district court dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus to compel appellant's release on bail.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
299 F.2d 938, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-esperdy-ca2-1962.