United States v. Esperdy

266 F.2d 957, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3762
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Esperdy. Read the opinion of the Court — 285 F.2d 341
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 1, 1959·No. 25410_1·Published

Opinion

266 F.2d 957

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. TIE SING ENG, Relator-Appellant,
v.
P. A. ESPERDY, as District Director of the Immigration Service for the District of New York, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 303.

Docket 25410.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 13, 1959.

Decided June 1, 1959.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Edward Weinfeld, Judge.

Abraham Lebenkoff, Stuart Wadler and Jules E. Coven, New York City, of counsel, for appellant.

Arthur H. Christy, U. S. Atty., New York City, Roy Babitt, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., New York City, of counsel, for appellee.

Before SWAN, HINCKS, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion below, United States ex rel. Tie Sing Eng v. Murff, D.C., 165 F.Supp. 633.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Esperdy, 266 F.2d 957, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3762 (2d Cir. 1959).

266 F.2d 957 (United States v. Esperdy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States Ex Rel. Tie Sing Eng v. Murff
165 F. Supp. 633 (S.D. New York, 1958)
United States ex rel. Tie Sing Eng v. Esperdy
266 F.2d 957 (Second Circuit, 1959)