United States v. Esperdy
This text of 274 F.2d 667 (United States v. Esperdy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
274 F.2d 667
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Tom WE SHUNG, Relator-Appellant,
v.
P. A. ESPERDY, District Director of the Immigration and
Naturalization Service for the New York District
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 163, Docket 25865.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 4, 1959.
Decided Feb. 15, 1960.
Louis Steinberg, New York City (Steinberg, Friedman & Blau, New York City, on the brief), for relator-appellant.
Roy Babitt, Sp. Asst. U.S.Atty., Southern District of New York, New York City (S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr., U.S.Atty., Southern District of New York, New York City, on the brief), for respondent-appellee.
Before CLARK, WATERMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The order is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Weinfeld, D.C., 176 F.Supp.253.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 F.2d 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-esperdy-ca2-1960.