United States v. Esperdy

274 F.2d 667
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Esperdy. Read the opinion of the Court — 285 F.2d 341
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 15, 1960·No. 25865·Published

Opinion

274 F.2d 667

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Tom WE SHUNG, Relator-Appellant,
v.
P. A. ESPERDY, District Director of the Immigration and
Naturalization Service for the New York District
Respondent-Appellee.

No. 163, Docket 25865.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 1959.
Decided Feb. 15, 1960.

Louis Steinberg, New York City (Steinberg, Friedman & Blau, New York City, on the brief), for relator-appellant.

Roy Babitt, Sp. Asst. U.S.Atty., Southern District of New York, New York City (S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr., U.S.Atty., Southern District of New York, New York City, on the brief), for respondent-appellee.

Before CLARK, WATERMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The order is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Weinfeld, D.C., 176 F.Supp.253.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Esperdy, 274 F.2d 667 (2d Cir. 1960).

274 F.2d 667 (United States v. Esperdy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.