United States v. Dawson
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ollie Dawson appeals the district court’s order denying Dawson’s motion for modification of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dawson, No. 4:95-cr-00963-CMC-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
312 F. App'x 549 (United States v. Dawson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.