United States v. Dawson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Dawson

286 F. App'x 40

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 11, 2008·No. No. 08-6986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Larry Donell Dawson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dawson, No. 8:99-cr-00783-GRA-1 (D.S.C. June 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Larry Donell Dawson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dawson, No. 8:99-cr-00783-GRA-1 (D.S.C. June 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Dawson, 286 F. App'x 40 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

286 F. App'x 40 (United States v. Dawson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related