United States v. Dawson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Dawson. Read the opinion of the Court — 587 F.3d 640
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2009·No. 08-8514·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8514

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

OLLIE DAWSON,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (4:95-cr-00963-CMC-2)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ollie Dawson, Appellant Pro Se. William E. Day, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ollie Dawson appeals the district court’s order

denying Dawson’s motion for modification of his sentence

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Dawson, No. 4:95-cr-00963-CMC-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 20, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dawson, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Dawson (United States v. Dawson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related