United States v. Copeland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7756

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLEVELAND DARNELL COPELAND, a/k/a Darnell, a/k/a Heavy D.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:00-cr-00424-PJM-15)

Submitted: February 16, 2010 Decided: March 3, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cleveland Darnell Copeland, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Cleveland Darnell Copeland appeals the district

court’s denial of his motions for reduction of sentence,

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Copeland, No. 8:00-cr-00424-PJM-15 (D. Md. Aug. 20, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED