United States v. Copeland

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 20, 2009·No. 08-8168·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8168

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SHAWN COPELAND,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:02-cr-00163-HCM-2)

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 20, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawn Copeland, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Shawn Copeland appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Copeland, No. 2:02-cr-00163-HCM-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Copeland, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Copeland (United States v. Copeland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related