United States v. Copeland

318 F. App'x 236

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Copeland appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Copeland, No. 2:02-cr-00163-HCM-2 (E.D.Va. Sept. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.