United States v. Coleman

373 F. App'x 423
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Coleman. Read the opinion of the Court — 319 F. App'x 228
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 8, 2010·No. No. 09-6910·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Berry Coleman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coleman, No. 3:01-cr-00093-RLV-1 (W.D.N.C. April 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Coleman, 373 F. App'x 423 (4th Cir. 2010).

373 F. App'x 423 (United States v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related